Subscribe to Itiviti Talks

OMS-EMS evolution: Tools for efficient order workflow

By Lars Wiberg, VP Strategic Research, Trading & Trade Execution
January 30, 2018
Share:

This is the first of a multi-part series that explores the past, present and future of Order Management Systems (OMS) and the closely related Execution Management Systems (EMS). We cover these trading tools mainly from a sell-side perspective.

An Order Management System (OMS) is a software application for facilitating and managing the order and trade flow between the (buy-side) client and different execution venues. The client normally sends orders to the sell-side (intermediary, typically a broker), using the FIX protocol. Order Managements Systems are employed both with the buy-side and the sell-side, where the more complicated set up is found at the latter.

OMSs first appeared as a natural outgrowth of electronic equities trading. With increasing order volumes, traders needed better support for managing the agency order flow in an efficient and cost-effective manner. The solution to this technology-created need was obviously to add more technology; the OMS, which became the hub that structures the inbound order flow and enables traders to route orders and to track trading activity and the progress of each order for various types of securities. The OMS performs vital functions such as allocations, position management, and communication between portfolio managers and traders. It ensures that orders are updated, reported back to the client and sent to mid/back office.

An Execution Management System (EMS) is designed to display market data and to provide seamless and fast access to trading destinations for the purpose of transacting orders. In contrast to an OMS, an EMS is focused on real-time trading, real-time market data, and analytics. An EMS typically offers the capability to manage orders across multiple trading venues, including exchanges, brokerage firms and alternative trading systems, sometimes with algorithmic support.

Both types of systems have grown far beyond their roots. And while an OMS can operate separate from or without an EMS, large efforts have been made over the past decade to integrate these two functions. OMS-EMS integration was initially limited to FIX integration and drop copies of trades going from one system to the other, whereby the trader manually attached the trades to the corresponding order. Automated staging from the OMS into the EMS allows trades to flow more seamlessly, increasing update rates and accuracy.

From the introduction of multi-market trading with fungible instruments and automated trading using execution algorithms, order flows have become increasingly complex, with splitting trades across multiple venues, aggregated orders, orders with pending allocations, pairs, contingent orders, baskets, order programs, multiple orders from different clients in the same instrument. They all need to be managed and executed, which calls for a tighter systems integration.

But in many real-world integration scenarios, legacy issues will appear. The EMS platform is likely newer, and often provided as a managed application service. This may preclude a tight integration with an older OMS or other trading applications that are deployed on-premise.

One of the great “architectural” issues in the OMS/EMS space deals with integrating and migrating trades from front-end execution to back-end clearing and settlement — to manage trades throughout the trading process.

Most software providers have taken a compartmentalized approach to this process, focusing on one aspect of trading, for example, trade execution or order management. However, this philosophy is rooted more in technological capability than in trader needs. The critical issue underlying the discussion is not which system is the best, but which solution that addresses workflow seamlessly without commingling different applications.

In the next post, we will look further into new functionality required from the next generation of OMS/EMS platforms, and the key drivers behind their development. Not surprisingly, regulatory change is one, while another factor is the growing reliance on multi-asset class trading strategies.

Related Content

Exploring the business side of Systematic Internalisation

Exploring the business side of Systematic Internalisation

Risk & Compliance Nine months into the MiFID II era, it’s time to look beyond the compliance issues and start considering the business opportunities presented to firms operating under the Systematic Internaliser regime. With the support from a value-adding regulatory solution, SI status can be used for competitive advantage, suggests Jonas Lindqvist, Principal, Trading and Trade Execution, Itiviti. […] October 9, 2018

Trading infrastructure testing: the main challenges

Trading infrastructure testing: the main challenges

FIX Infrastructure In previous blog posts, we have discussed the importance of trading infrastructure testing and the regulatory and operational impetus driving its necessity. But when push comes to shove, how easy is it to implement these complex systems? What types of testing solutions are available, and what are the biggest challenges to their adoption? Today’s trading […] October 2, 2018

Industrializing the trading technology stack: the benefits of UL Bridge

Industrializing the trading technology stack: the benefits of UL Bridge

Risk & Compliance Trading firms across the board are discovering that operational and regulatory requirements increasingly demand a consistent approach to connectivity, messaging and data management. To industrialize their response to these emerging requirements – to address the challenges in a streamlined, consistent and scalable way – firms need to put in place a centralized connectivity and messaging […] September 25, 2018

Systematic Internalisers: opportunities in a post-MiFID II world

Systematic Internalisers: opportunities in a post-MiFID II world

Execution In the months following the implementation of MiFID II, we have seen and will continue to see a number of Systematic Internalisers (SIs) appear on the market – some of their own volition, some following ESMA’s publication of benchmark data and thresholds. What we have seen is that many of these SIs started off by […] September 18, 2018

Itiviti Talks

Itiviti Talks is your source for the technology perspective on the global capital markets. We have created this to be an engaging forum for sharing ideas with our clients, partners and other industry professionals. You will find videos, blog posts, white papers and more that deal with the needs and challenges of brokers, market makers and trading executives.
 
Watch, read and enjoy for new inspiration and insights.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Subscribe

Subscription successful

Thank you for subscribing!

Close window

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Weekly email

    Trends in global capital markets from a technology perspective.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.