Subscribe to Itiviti Talks

MiFID II metadata requirement underpins compliance

By Johannes Frey-Skött, Vice President Engineering Agency Trading Apps, Itiviti
November 28, 2017
Share:

Much has been made of the impact of MiFID II on the European financial market structure and the core activities of market participants. Less visible, though, is the regulation’s prescriptive approach to categorisation of certain market activities. This categorisation governs how firms behave with respect to order flow, client classification, trading volume caps and other aspects of their business.

Firms are struggling to establish their data coverage in a few key areas, among them product set-up, and pre- and post-trade transparency, where MiFID II’s decision trees dictate how trading firms operate. All financial instruments traded need to be registered with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), along with any required reference or metadata. Thus, any firm issuing new instruments will need to register those products.

At the same time, any firm intending to act as a market-maker in any given instrument needs to ensure the product is registered with ESMA or with the firm’s National Competent Authority (NCA) and set up the instrument in their security master with all associated reference data.

Meanwhile, under MiFID II’s pre-trade transparency requirements, trading venues and systematic internalisers need to provide price transparency for the instrument pre-trade and trade unless a waiver can be applied. Reference data is needed to apply the appropriate waiver, or to indicate whether a security is Liquid, or that the order is Large in Scale (LIS), relative to the market, or larger than Size Specific to Instrument (SSTI).

To navigate the MIFID II decision trees, the liquidity flags, waivers, thresholds and deferral periods that define their activities and how they need to administer them under MiFID II, firms need to ensure they have the required reference data in place. MiFID II lays out a specific set of reference data required for compliance. These include the use of:

  • The global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) for instrument identification
  • The International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) for securities identification
  • Derivatives identifiers from the Association of National Numbering Agencies’ (ANNA) Derivatives Service Bureau (DSB)
  • Market identification codes (MICs)
  • Instrument classifications (ISO 10962)
  • Currency codes (ISO 4217), and
  • Classification of instruments in terms of liquidity, trade size and other parameters.

Between them, these impact how any given security is handled under MiFID II and MiFIR. To get the classification right, firms must have processes in place for sourcing and managing the specific metadata sets needed for correct instrument and entity definitions.

To aid in firms’ compliance, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is developing its own Financial Instruments Reference Data System (FIRDS), which is designed to carry a superset of all instruments to be regulated across the EU. FIRDS will hold reference data relating to the entire set of banks, exchanges and OTC trading venues operating within the EU under MiFID II, and all instruments, issuers and counterparties.

Although details of how this will all work remain sparse, FIRDS’s stated remit is to collect and publish reference data efficiently and in a harmonised way across the EU in support of market participants’ MiFID II compliance activities.

Once developed, the system will contain data covering all financial instruments within the scope of MiFID II. Under MiFIR, all trading venues and systematic internalisers must submit instrument reference data in a uniform format to NCAs, which are then required to deliver that data to ESMA, although some NCAs have delegated data collection to ESMA.

FIRDS will link data feeds between ESMA, NCAs and approximately 300 EU trading venues. The data will be published by ESMA, but will also be used to calculate transparency and liquidity thresholds, and position reporting of commodity derivatives.

FIRDS will act in essence as a consolidated source of MiFID II reference data. Financial institutions need to be able to receive and consume the subset of the FIRDS database that is relevant to its customers and activities. To ensure consistency, therefore, firms will need to map FIRDS and other external data sets with appropriate internal data sets to ensure compliance.

This multiple sourcing in turn requires cross-referencing to ensure like-for-like comparisons and consistency. MiFID II requires massive amounts of data to be collected, normalised, analysed and presented in a user-friendly way.

Download our MiFID II white paper

Related Content

Exploring the business side of Systematic Internalisation

Exploring the business side of Systematic Internalisation

Risk & Compliance Nine months into the MiFID II era, it’s time to look beyond the compliance issues and start considering the business opportunities presented to firms operating under the Systematic Internaliser regime. With the support from a value-adding regulatory solution, SI status can be used for competitive advantage, suggests Jonas Lindqvist, Principal, Trading and Trade Execution, Itiviti. […] October 9, 2018

Industrializing the trading technology stack: the benefits of UL Bridge

Industrializing the trading technology stack: the benefits of UL Bridge

Risk & Compliance Trading firms across the board are discovering that operational and regulatory requirements increasingly demand a consistent approach to connectivity, messaging and data management. To industrialize their response to these emerging requirements – to address the challenges in a streamlined, consistent and scalable way – firms need to put in place a centralized connectivity and messaging […] September 25, 2018

MiFID II: The implications for trading systems and infrastructure

MiFID II: The implications for trading systems and infrastructure

Risk & Compliance MiFID II marked a sea change in the approach to the handling of order, trade and transaction data. Rigorous new requirements around data capture, analysis, reporting and record-keeping made the communication of data a central theme in ensuring trading systems were MiFID II compliant, and connectivity – between external and internal systems, databases and processors […] August 14, 2018

MiFID II in action: half-year review

MiFID II in action: half-year review

Risk & Compliance Roughly six months after the introduction of MiFID II, Johannes Frey-Skött – VP Apps Engineering, Itiviti – talks to The TRADE about the short-term impact of the regulation on European market players, looking at both the positive and negative effects witnessed so far. He also outlines current pain points in MiFID II compliance and the […] July 17, 2018

Itiviti Talks

Itiviti Talks is your source for the technology perspective on the global capital markets. We have created this to be an engaging forum for sharing ideas with our clients, partners and other industry professionals. You will find videos, blog posts, white papers and more that deal with the needs and challenges of brokers, market makers and trading executives.
 
Watch, read and enjoy for new inspiration and insights.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Subscribe

Subscription successful

Thank you for subscribing!

Close window

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Weekly email

    Trends in global capital markets from a technology perspective.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.