The key to effective volatility management

By Katarina Klangby, Director Content Marketing
January 28, 2016
Share:

Interview with Yuri Shpolanskiy, VP Quantitative Engineering, Itiviti

Yuri, you head up Itiviti’s quantitative team. What, in your opinion, is the key to effective volatility management?

The key to effective volatility management is accurate modeling – the ability to describe the market and volatility surface, how it should transform as the market moves, and whether to use any automatic fitting techniques. Fitting is a mathematical procedure to find a curve that follows the market volatilities closely.

For comprehensive volatility management, I recommend a combination of volatility models, such as the widely used Wing, CCS (Clamped Cubic Spline) and SVI (Stochastic Volatility Inspired). Each volatility model has different behavior and parameterization, giving the flexibility to cover a wide range of derivative contracts and markets trading today. Firms will often need to apply different models depending on the scenario, as a model may fit a certain contract and market very well, but may not be suitable for another contract and market. For example, we typically find that US commodity options traders prefer CCS as they need finer point-per-point control, while European equity traders often use Wing. And sometimes, it’s just personal preference. 

Regarding the curve fitting, when the mathematical problem is linear, it is fairly straightforward. However, the typical problem is not linear, comes with several constraints and thus leads to a more complicated, non-linear equation. Non-linearity requires a sophisticated and stable algorithm, which solves non-linear equations by iterations. A robust numerical procedure for all volatility models is paramount.

How do you provide stable fitting as the market changes?

One way is of course to fit the curve to the market every time it moves, but constant re-calculations have a negative impact on performance. A more efficient method is to monitor a specified set of criteria. As long as the volatility curve remains within these criteria, there is no need to re-adjust the fitting.

How do you achieve accurate volatility management without compromising performance?

– First, we ensure that the fitting procedure itself is fast.

– Second, the fitting procedure must be stable, meaning that it should not switch to an alternate route to solve the problem. The SVI model, for instance, offers a number of possible routes, but changing routes also requires changing parameters.

– The most complicated problem is to select the right criteria for when to apply, and when not to apply, the parameters found by the fitting algorithm. We have received many requests from our customers for help in this area.

You are working on a solution that will allow firms to use historical data for auto-fitting analysis. Why is this good?

It is very cool to be able to go back and examine historical data, because it shows how the algorithm reacts to changes in real life. This is crucial to understand in order to work out the criteria for when to re-adjust the curve. There are hundreds of potentially interesting parameters, but to consider them all would produce a terribly inefficient workflow. The trick is to understand which parameters are the most important, and to implement an automated solution for applying these parameters.

How do Itiviti’s customers use the volatility management models?

Some use the models out-of-the-box, others take advantage of the ability to customize them. Many actually switch between models depending on the product. There are two main scenarios:

– They specify their own parameters (and hide our suggestions)

– They base their volatility management on our suggestions, which in turn are based on typical situations specified by our customers.

Their choice really depends on the situation. They examine plots, and if they see that the curve applies inappropriately for them, they make changes.

In your opinion, what sets Itiviti’s volatility management apart?

One important aspect, from our customers’ perspective, is the ability to implement custom volatility models. It is also easy to modify the user interface of our volatility manager applications to create a customized environment.

This level of flexibility also makes it easy for us to make improvements. The application is constantly improved; not once or twice a year, but every day. A team of mathematicians and software engineers introduces new features and mathematically improves the algorithms based on customer feedback, proprietary and academic research.

Our expressed goal is to be the market leader in volatility management. Our customers should be the judges of that claim, but I believe that with customizable models, fast and accurate fitting algorithms and low impact on performance, we’re well on our way. 

Related Content

Systematic Internalisers: opportunities in a post-MiFID II world

Systematic Internalisers: opportunities in a post-MiFID II world

Execution In the months following the implementation of MiFID II, we have seen and will continue to see a number of Systematic Internalisers (SIs) appear on the market – some of their own volition, some following ESMA’s publication of benchmark data and thresholds. What we have seen is that many of these SIs started off by […] September 18, 2018

Why infrastructure testing is critical to your trading business

Why infrastructure testing is critical to your trading business

FIX Infrastructure End-to-end testing of trading infrastructure is critical in today’s increasingly heavily regulated environment – but compliance comes at a price. So why should financial firms pay it, and what happens if they don’t? In our second blog post on the topic, we explore the most pressing reasons to implement a robust testing mechanism. The most […] September 11, 2018

Trading infrastructure testing and why it’s important

Trading infrastructure testing and why it’s important

FIX Infrastructure As trading processes become ever more sophisticated and regulators race to catch up, the end-to-end testing of trading infrastructure is an increasingly crucial component of compliance. Financial services firms face severe penalties for trading errors – including fines, loss of reputation, potential bankruptcy and even personal repercussions for senior executives. The cost of failure is […] August 21, 2018

Multi-asset platforms well equipped for Forex trading as markets converge

Multi-asset platforms well equipped for Forex trading as markets converge

Trading Forex trading is increasingly influenced by and synchronized with equities. With this trend come new opportunities and challenges for Forex market participants. The trading styles and tools traditionally used for Forex are converging with other asset classes, enabling multi-asset and true cross-asset trading, and presenting an opportunity to consolidate and streamline trading technology. Download the […] August 7, 2018

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Subscribe

Subscription successful

Thank you for subscribing!

Close window

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Weekly email

    Trends in global capital markets from a technology perspective.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.