Identifying and responding to the demands of traders

By Martin NIlsson
April 27, 2017
Share:

The fast pace of derivatives markets makes their participants a demanding group. Derivatives traders must be flexible to succeed, and also need functional capabilities in their technology such as speed, global access and powerful analytics. They confront these needs in an environment affected by new regulation, plus more demands for market access and lower costs.

To keep up with changes in market structure and more new products appearing on the market, derivatives traders must replace tools that have become obsolete. A TABB Group survey of 72 buy-side, sell-side and proprietary trading firms found that half of those firms plan to implement new derivatives trading platforms in the next three years.

The increasing structural complexity of derivatives markets that has resulted from the growth in their volumes drives firms to rely more on technology for their operations. Specifically, the demands of derivatives markets and their operations technology are manifesting in that greater interest in replacing old trading platforms. So users or potential users of these systems are thinking about what functions on their platforms need improvement and what traits of a platform are most important when choosing which platform to install.

The TABB Group survey also asked firms what parts of their derivatives trading platforms need improvement, and how important certain aspects are when choosing a derivatives trading platforms. A few areas of platforms that survey respondents cited as needing improvement also were indicated as important to choosing a platform, particularly compliance capabilities (39% said these need improvement and 84% said these are important to choosing a platform), ease of customisation (50% said needs improvement, 83% said it factors in choosing) and work flow integration (40% said needs improvement, 80% factor it in choosing).

Along with ease of customization, back-office support and risk management were each also cited by 50% of the survey respondents as parts of their derivatives trading platforms that need improvement. Latency and multi-asset support were cited by some respondents as aspects also needing improvement.

Functionality was cited by 95% of those surveyed as important to choosing a derivatives trading platform. Other reasons were each mentioned by at least 80% of those surveyed, including cost of ownership, exchange coverage, availability and redundancy, as well as the items that were also cited as areas for improvement.

The results of the survey support the notion that regulatory compliance capability will figure strongly in firms’ decisions about new derivatives trading platforms, with new derivatives regulation on the horizon. Concern about customisation and work flow integration are in keeping with the demands on derivatives traders for flexibility. The near-total preference for functionality as a factor in choosing a platform reflects the perceived importance of speed, access and analytics capability. In addition, the survey results proved the demand for access to more markets (greater exchange coverage) and lower costs of operation for platforms.

Related Content

The need to take an enterprise approach to testing

The need to take an enterprise approach to testing

FIX Infrastructure It goes without saying that it’s imperative for trading technologists to thoroughly test their systems before the put them in a production environment. Clearly, building a market-beating trading platform requires a high level of uptime and a propensity for failure that’s as close to zero as possible. And for years technologists have used a range […] November 5, 2018

The operational benefits of infrastructure testing

The operational benefits of infrastructure testing

FIX Infrastructure Getting it right. In earlier blog posts, we’ve discussed the challenges of implementing efficient trading infrastructure testing systems, and the intricate complexities of their adoption. But once all this hard work is completed, what are the potential rewards to be reaped? The operational benefits from instituting an enterprise-wide approach to trading system testing go far […] October 23, 2018

Exploring the business side of Systematic Internalisation

Exploring the business side of Systematic Internalisation

Risk & Compliance Nine months into the MiFID II era, it’s time to look beyond the compliance issues and start considering the business opportunities presented to firms operating under the Systematic Internaliser regime. With the support from a value-adding regulatory solution, SI status can be used for competitive advantage, suggests Jonas Lindqvist, Principal, Trading and Trade Execution, Itiviti. […] October 9, 2018

Trading infrastructure testing: the main challenges

Trading infrastructure testing: the main challenges

FIX Infrastructure In previous blog posts, we have discussed the importance of trading infrastructure testing and the regulatory and operational impetus driving its necessity. But when push comes to shove, how easy is it to implement these complex systems? What types of testing solutions are available, and what are the biggest challenges to their adoption? Today’s trading […] October 2, 2018

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Subscribe

Subscription successful

Thank you for subscribing!

Close window

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Weekly email

    Trends in global capital markets from a technology perspective.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.