Subscribe to Itiviti Talks

FX: Filtering out the noise in surveillance systems

December 4, 2017
Share:

The world of FX has been fortunate to have relatively easy access to good practices and advanced technological solutions, but when it comes to implementing an effective surveillance programme, the task remains a significant challenge. In an article recently published by Euromoney magazine, several industry figures – including Itiviti’s Johannes Frey-Skött, Vice President Trading Apps – break down the factors behind this difficulty and provide guidance for FX firms looking to find effective solutions.

Key elements
In essence, the complexity associated with surveillance programmes revolves around data: where to collect it, how (and how much) to collect, and how to analyze it. The key is to set reasonable thresholds that successfully detect suspicious activity without creating an unmanageable amount of false positives. Crucially, staff also needs to be trained to analyze and interpret the alerts that come out of a system in order for appropriate action to be taken, particularly in light of MAR and MiFID II regulations. While this is true for all asset classes, FX differs in that manipulative activity is likely to be more spread out across different venues, which will affect the type of monitoring and alerting necessary.

An additional level of complexity exists in that FX trading venues are typically required to have a number of rules to give operational effect to statutory regulations. Firms thus need to ensure that their surveillance systems are able to adjust in a way that ensures they are not in breach of the venue’s rules, which in many cases need to be reported to the statutory regulator.

A business advantage
In a world of shrinking budgets, firms can benefit from taking a holistic approach and leveraging systems that can provide additional functionality around areas such as market maker compliance, best execution, TCA and algo monitoring. This will facilitate the record keeping, reporting and analysis activities required by other regulations such as MiFID II and thus allow for significant cost savings, particularly if the solution is system agnostic (such as Itiviti Analyst).
Perhaps most importantly, FX firms should also recognize the very real potential for tangible business benefits arising from the collection and analysis of so much data. Although the primary goal of a surveillance system will always be to monitor and detect suspicious activity, the information that is gathered can undoubtedly be repurposed and used for business development ends. In this sense, any investment in surveillance technology is as much a business-driven one as a regulatory-driven one, making the selection of a reliable system even more critical.

Related Content

A new leader in capital market technologies

A new leader in capital market technologies

Execution In March 2018, Itiviti and ULLINK completed a merger to build a global technology force in the capital markets industry. With extensive and complementary expertise, each company brings a unique heritage and product offering to the table that, when combined, create a new world leader in multi-asset trading and financial infrastructure solutions. May 3, 2018

Innovation in Order Management Systems

Innovation in Order Management Systems

Execution In the final video in this OMS-EMS series, Lars Wiberg, VP Strategic Research Trading and Trade Execution, discusses innovation in the order and execution management and outlines the most pressing challenges facing firms post-MiFID II. Go to Solutions April 4, 2018

OMS-EMS evolution: Drivers of new functionality

OMS-EMS evolution: Drivers of new functionality

Execution This is the second part in a series that explores the past, present and future of Order Management Systems (OMS) and the closely related Execution Management Systems (EMS). We cover these trading tools mainly from a sell-side perspective. As financial markets change, new demands on trading technology appear. This includes the functional requirements of the […] February 27, 2018

Regulation in a post-globalization environment

Regulation in a post-globalization environment

Risk & Compliance Jim Northey, Senior Vice President Strategy and Research at Itiviti, explores the topic of regulation in a post-globalization environment. In the wake of Brexit and the US election, are we moving away from unified regulatory equivalence to regulatory arbitrage, with single countries taking advantage of regulatory changes to attract market share? February 5, 2018

Itiviti Talks

Itiviti Talks is your source for the technology perspective on the global capital markets. We have created this to be an engaging forum for sharing ideas with our clients, partners and other industry professionals. You will find videos, blog posts, white papers and more that deal with the needs and challenges of brokers, market makers and trading executives.
 
Watch, read and enjoy for new inspiration and insights.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Subscribe

Subscription successful

Thank you for subscribing!

Close window

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Weekly email

    Trends in global capital markets from a technology perspective.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.