After years of stagnant trading volumes and shrinking margins, sell-side institutions are now facing a new set of challenges. Increasing regulatory demands and their effects on markets put the pressure on banks and brokers to remodel their entire business approach. Conventional initiatives for cost-cutting and streamlining operations will not suffice; banks and brokers must also adjust to structural changes in the regulatory and market landscapes.
Finding their way forward while under this pressure, firms are taking a fresh look at trading technology, to find solutions that enable their adjustment to new market and regulatory realities, while making trading operations more cost effective.
Regulatory change is today the single dominating force now driving investments in trading technology, confirmed by recent TABB Group research (see graphic). More than half of all respondents cited regulatory and compliance complexity as their biggest challenge.
Source: TABB Group report “Derivatives Trading Technology: Structural complexity driving next-generation demands”, August 2016
New regulatory frameworks such as MiFID II not only means that market participants must adjust to individual requirements put on their internal operations, it will also bring about changes to market structure and the way trading is conducted. One example is the new double volume cap clause which is part of the new transparency framework in MiFID II. Another is the extended definition of the Systematic Internalisers (SI) regime.
These developments will make execution a considerably more complex exercise, both for investment firms engaged in agency trading as well as principal trading.
From a trading technology viewpoint, we have identified four key trends re-shaping the sell-side:
1. Regulatory change will drive technology landscape overhaul.
MiFID II will profoundly reshape the markets when introduced in early 2018. The regulation will have direct and indirect impact on the sell side. This is why compliance is now a critical component in any technology vendor selection process. The challenges are manageable because they are known in advance and can be prepared for by implementing appropriate technology and processes.
2. Vendor and system consolidation
As sourced trading technology is increasingly replacing in-house developed and managed trading systems, firms want to limit their number of vendor relationships, preferring vendors that offer multi-asset class solutions to reduce complexity and management overhead.
3. Managed services becoming the norm
Banks and brokers are seeking less expensive alternatives to in-house trading technology operation. Even in firms where any kind of outsourcing was unthinkable just a few years back, managed services are now increasingly becoming the norm.
4. Expansion to new asset classes and multi-asset trading
The expansion into new asset classes is driven both by regulations such as MiFID II and new market requirements. This is already evident in high frequency trading, where HFT firms have entered FX trading as the equities field became “crowded”.
For further reading, download and read Itiviti’s new article “Sell-side evolution” where we explore the trends that are now re-shaping the sell-side in greater detail.
FIX Infrastructure Since the introduction of FIX in the mid-1990s, it has revolutionized the world of trade execution – so much so that 99.5% of the trades performed globally today are being made via FIX. But when it comes to post-trade, the industry has yet to leverage the many benefits that FIX can bring, particularly in terms […] November 8, 2018
FIX Infrastructure It goes without saying that it’s imperative for trading technologists to thoroughly test their systems before the put them in a production environment. Clearly, building a market-beating trading platform requires a high level of uptime and a propensity for failure that’s as close to zero as possible. And for years technologists have used a range […] November 5, 2018
FIX Infrastructure Getting it right. In earlier blog posts, we’ve discussed the challenges of implementing efficient trading infrastructure testing systems, and the intricate complexities of their adoption. But once all this hard work is completed, what are the potential rewards to be reaped? The operational benefits from instituting an enterprise-wide approach to trading system testing go far […] October 23, 2018
Risk & Compliance Nine months into the MiFID II era, it’s time to look beyond the compliance issues and start considering the business opportunities presented to firms operating under the Systematic Internaliser regime. With the support from a value-adding regulatory solution, SI status can be used for competitive advantage, suggests Jonas Lindqvist, Principal, Trading and Trade Execution, Itiviti. […] October 9, 2018
By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.