Request complimentary report

Firms look to managed services for agility and cost benefits

By Martin Nilsson
February 1, 2017
Share:

Despite the continuing uncertain economic and political environment, firms are now looking to modernize their derivatives trading infrastructure. The compelling arguments for change – the cost savings, functionality gains and increased agility offered by today’s commercial platforms – are at last overcoming the intransigence lingering since the credit crisis, but now with managed services as part of the mix.

A recent TABB Group survey of 72 buy-side, sell-side and proprietary trading firms that are active in the global derivatives markets suggests the marketplace has a stock of aging trading platforms. According to the survey, a majority of firms (53%) have been using the same derivatives trading platform for the past five years or more, with less than 10% of those surveyed claiming to be using what could be called a ‘new’ platform of under two years of age.

As Silicon Valley will tell you, five years is an eternity in fast-moving technology circles. So why is our cutting edge derivatives trading community so resistant to change?

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it?

In some cases, firms are satisfied with current functionality. But there’s more to the phenomenon of aging platforms than simply: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

One challenge facing technologists attempting to remain at the leading edge of the market is stickiness; platforms – particularly those developed in-house – tend to become embedded into the fabric of daily work flow. Once there, they are difficult to dislodge, even when the benefits of moving forward with a new platform seem obvious. Budgetary constraints and the fear of lengthy replacement cycles add to the reticence.

But the TABB survey suggests a new willingness to progress with modernization plans. More than half of respondents said they expect to deploy new derivatives trading platforms within the next three years. Of these, 44% expect to implement a new platform during 2018.

What’s more, firms are looking to capitalize on the flexibility and agility offered by commercial systems, rather than commit to the cost and effort of developing in-house. Significantly, too, they are looking at emerging hosting models to offload responsibility for operational running and maintenance of their trading platforms.

According to the survey, almost one-third of respondents currently use a trading platform solution that is fully hosted offsite by their chosen supplier. A further 22% use a managed services model with their vendor providing logistical support for an on-site deployment, and 27% are using a mixed approach. Today, less than 10% of firms are using a fully internally developed and hosted platform for derivatives trading.

This is in line with a broader trend towards outsourced solutions as firms seek to reduce their broad IT expenditures and reduce the ‘footprint’ of internal systems. In the case of derivatives trading systems, offloading responsibility for balancing applications, market data and hardware operational requirements can relieve a major burden on IT and operations staff, reduce costs and boost the agility required to navigate today’s complex and fast-moving global markets.

Related Content

Systematic Internalisers: opportunities in a post-MiFID II world

Systematic Internalisers: opportunities in a post-MiFID II world

Execution In the months following the implementation of MiFID II, we have seen and will continue to see a number of Systematic Internalisers (SIs) appear on the market – some of their own volition, some following ESMA’s publication of benchmark data and thresholds. What we have seen is that many of these SIs started off by […] September 18, 2018

Why infrastructure testing is critical to your trading business

Why infrastructure testing is critical to your trading business

FIX Infrastructure End-to-end testing of trading infrastructure is critical in today’s increasingly heavily regulated environment – but compliance comes at a price. So why should financial firms pay it, and what happens if they don’t? In our second blog post on the topic, we explore the most pressing reasons to implement a robust testing mechanism. The most […] September 11, 2018

Case study: Redburn leverages UL BRIDGE for FIX onboarding

Case study: Redburn leverages UL BRIDGE for FIX onboarding

FIX Infrastructure Redburn is Europe’s largest independent equities broker, providing institutional investors with equity research and agency execution across European and US equity markets. As an evolving business it is essential that it is able to provide a high level of service to its clients – particularly when it comes to connectivity and onboarding. Covering such a […] August 29, 2018

Trading infrastructure testing and why it’s important

Trading infrastructure testing and why it’s important

FIX Infrastructure As trading processes become ever more sophisticated and regulators race to catch up, the end-to-end testing of trading infrastructure is an increasingly crucial component of compliance. Financial services firms face severe penalties for trading errors – including fines, loss of reputation, potential bankruptcy and even personal repercussions for senior executives. The cost of failure is […] August 21, 2018

Request TABB Group Report: Derivatives Trading Technology: Structural Complexity Driving Next Generation Demands.

Please complete the form to download this report.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Subscribe

Subscription successful

Thank you for subscribing!

Close window

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Weekly email

    Trends in global capital markets from a technology perspective.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.