In a low interest rate environment with regulatory hurdles, capital requirements, and technological complexities, how do firms in the futures industry thrive?
We gathered one seasoned fin tech reporter, Jim Kharouf from John Lothian News, and representatives from an FCM, an ISV, a prop firm/market maker, and a bank – to join us at a busy Chicago steakhouse, for a candid discussion about the state of the futures industry.
The contributors unanimously agreed that the current business environment remains challenging. Amongst the obstacles mentioned by FCM representatives were increased capital requirements, the additional liability carried on behalf of their customers (recently exemplified by Advantage Futures settlement with the CFTC on rules 1.73 and 1.11), account for clearing costs in their business models, and cope with risk models that are not perceived Furthermore, banks’ withdrawal from markets has resulted in fleeting liquidity.
Interestingly, in spite of headwinds, all participants are finding ways to grow their business. As the FCM segment contracts, larger firms have the opportunity to consolidate business. There was a consensus in the group that it was increasingly important to leverage core competencies and focus resources in niche areas. Likewise, trading firms with adequate capital and technology capacity have an opportunity to fill some of the void left by banks–a number are also exploring diversification strategies.
Industry participants are increasingly leveraging third-party technology to offset cost and complexity. The challenge remains finding vendors with the longevity and market knowledge to be partners, and solutions that allow participants to focus on core business drivers. One participant commented that sometimes vended solutions look good on paper, and may perform to specifications, but that his main concern was around all aspects, including operational, which may not be up to scratch to make a purchase worthwhile.
Speaking of the coming years, the group opined that cost and regulatory hurdles are so high in the current environment that few new entrants are expected. For incumbents that are able to focus on their core competencies, and remain differentiated from their competition, new opportunities will be found now and going forward.
To read the full report from John Lothian News, please click here
Risk & Compliance Roughly six months after the introduction of MiFID II, Johannes Frey-Skött – VP Apps Engineering, Itiviti – talks to The TRADE about the short-term impact of the regulation on European market players, looking at both the positive and negative effects witnessed so far. He also outlines current pain points in MiFID II compliance and the […] July 17, 2018
Risk & Compliance With the pressure of initial implementation now a distant memory, MiFID II-regulated firms are turning their attention to the real work required to create sustainable long-term solutions. For many, the race to meet the January 3 deadline meant implementing temporary compliance processes that were far from perfect. Unless updated and improved, these could lead to […] July 10, 2018
Risk & Compliance What happens when one of the top 10 active brokers in Canada is confronted with: Stringent risk control requirements for electronic trading Time-to-market imperative to supersede TMX’ monitoring service termination Need to consolidate 14 internal trading platforms into a central gateway for enterprise-level risk management Optimization of latency and access speed for client connectivity Download […] June 26, 2018
FIX Infrastructure Testing in the financial industry is changing, both as a consequence of new regulatory requirements and in response to changing perceptions of the value it generates. In this video, Pawan Sharma – VP Global Services at Itiviti – delves into the factors that have driven the evolution of testing practices and the key challenges that […] June 19, 2018
By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.