The marketplace is waiting in anticipation for ESMA’s final technical guidance – expected this month – on the wide-ranging MiFID II regulation due to come into effect in January 2017.
After delaying publication date from July, ESMA looks set to deliver on time. This is good news, as practitioners surely need as much time as they can get to prepare for MiFID II’s changes. January 2017 is just 15 months away, and much work still needs to be done.
As you’re doubtless aware, MiFID II will both build on its predecessor – MiFID I – and expand its remit beyond equities to fixed income, derivatives and other markets.
MiFID II is both more prescriptive and wide in scope. Its stated aim of bringing new levels of transparency to Europe’s markets translates into new rules around internal order-matching, trade-reporting, testing of algorithms, post-trade work flow and a whole host of other areas of the securities business.
As an example, the rules with respect to systematic internalization will drastically change. Firms may find they now qualify as SIs where previously they did not.
All of these changes require big decisions – on business strategy, operations and technology – from those affected, many of whom have been delaying until they understood the detail of the requirement.
Here is where the hard work begins. The new guidance will require a careful reading to understand the degree to which firms are affected. The big decisions will revolve around how much time, effort and money will be required to comply, and whether certain affected business activities warrant the investment.
Some will identify opportunity.
Execution This is the second part in a series that explores the past, present and future of Order Management Systems (OMS) and the closely related Execution Management Systems (EMS). We cover these trading tools mainly from a sell-side perspective. As financial markets change, new demands on trading technology appear. This includes the functional requirements of the […] February 27, 2018
Risk & Compliance Jim Northey, Senior Vice President Strategy and Research at Itiviti, explores the topic of regulation in a post-globalization environment. In the wake of Brexit and the US election, are we moving away from unified regulatory equivalence to regulatory arbitrage, with single countries taking advantage of regulatory changes to attract market share? February 5, 2018
Execution What sets Itiviti solutions and technology apart from the rest? Itiviti staff explain in their own words. Go to Itiviti solutions January 9, 2018
Risk & Compliance Johannes Frey-Skött, VP Apps Engineering at Itiviti, discusses the data collection and retention challenges presented by MiFID II and tackled by Itiviti Analyst – winner of “Best New Technology Product – Regulatory Reporting” at the FOW International Awards 2017.* MiFID II has far-reaching and multi-faceted implications for European market participants, but if one were to […] December 21, 2017