There is a growing market acceptance that trading systems don’t necessarily need to be entirely customized and proprietary in nature to be competitive. As market participants see the complexity of maintaining proprietary trading technology, availability of standards-based low-latency platforms, and the increasing regulatory requirements; firms are re-evaluating how to best deploy and support their technology stack.
At Itiviti, we see a trend emerging where firms buy components and integrate these with existing trading infrastructure. Itiviti customers are leveraging our next generation trading platform in a way that enables them to plug in new capabilities with app-based solutions.
Let’s explore how to take advantage of #BuyANDBuild innovation, how the trend has emerged and how Itiviti offers a viable alternative to traditional development of in-house trading solutions.
Leveraging the #BuyANDBuild concept
While customized trading logic cannot be part of an out-of-the-box solution, there are generic components in any trading system. For example, connectivity to trade on an exchange as well as modules for managing market data, transactions and positions are always required. However, it makes less sense to custom build such functionality as it becomes increasingly commoditized.
Large firms that have traditionally developed software in-house are recognizing that building a full trading technology stack is no longer a requirement for maintaining their competitive edge.
At the same time, smaller players can also benefit from buying and building. Where many firms have long faced prohibitive costs associated with custom software development, they can now afford to implement unique functionality.
Transparency to facilitate customization
While typical hurdles for acquiring third-party systems include an inability to adapt to existing trading infrastructures, lack of control and concerns over performance, Itiviti has designed our next generation platform with these challenges in mind.
For example, Itiviti believes that markets participants need control over the direction of their business. We prove this by offering transparency, including access to business logic source code, which greatly facilitates building proprietary additions.
Finally, knowing there are future market unknowns, all Itiviti platforms and solutions are designed with flexibility in mind. The front end can be adapted to the workflow needs of individual traders, the modular architecture can be adapted to address the context-specific needs of existing infrastructure and Itiviti customers can extend existing execution strategies, pricing logic and user interfaces.
If you are interested in learning more about the #BuyANDBuild trend or about Itiviti’s next generation platform, please visit Tbricks by Itiviti.
Execution Participants of the GlobalTrading roundtable “Future-proofing trade execution systems” discuss their key takeaways from the event, including the challenges posed by current and future regulation, the buy vs. build dichotomy, the need to maximize the impact of technology, the challenges and opportunities posed by technology and current trends around system consolidation. Interviewees include: – James […] March 20, 2018
Execution Regulation, technological advances and behavioral changes mean that trade automation will increase, which will in turn force systems and their providers to become more agile, agree speakers at a GlobalTrading roundtable. The degree to which firms should standardize and the merits of outsourcing, however, remain controversial topics. This video and article sum up the key […] March 15, 2018
Execution Lars Wiberg, VP Strategic Research Trading and Trade Execution, discusses pre- and post-MiFID II trends in the OMS-EMS arena, covering a number of issues including consolidation, optimization, cost savings, workflow, globalization and outsourcing. March 7, 2018
Execution This is the second part in a series that explores the past, present and future of Order Management Systems (OMS) and the closely related Execution Management Systems (EMS). We cover these trading tools mainly from a sell-side perspective. As financial markets change, new demands on trading technology appear. This includes the functional requirements of the […] February 27, 2018