To buy or not to buy — that is the question in financial technology. Or at least it has been for a very long time. The arguments for building in-house have remained constant and include the need for performance and the quest for differentiation (such as customized trading strategies). At the same time, time-to-market, complexity and – most obviously – cost, were key arguments for buying. But what if there was a third approach: buy and build?
All of the arguments for build and buy respectively still have merit, but we believe that their respective weights have shifted over time, effectively making in-house development an even more exclusive option. The most significant driver behind this shift is the advance of technology and a more flexible approach to trading system design.
High-speed trading connectivity has been a major advantage for the past several years. But as low-latency infrastructures become a mainstream capability, the cost of generating incremental speed has become prohibitive, and market participants are seeking new ways to differentiate their activities.
Firms are seeking to add value to their trading systems, while maintaining the high-speed connectivity they need to remain competitive. To accommodate new capabilities – in the form of pre-trade analytics, risk controls and post-trade clearing intelligence – trading firms across the board are re-evaluating their systems.
A higher level of trading system flexibility based on modern system architecture and the use more open technologies, means that smaller players can start to add unique functionality where before they were constrained by resource to use of vanilla third-party systems with little scope for differentiation.
A modern trading system such as Tbricks by Itiviti allows clients to choose freely from a library of business logic (we call this apps) for a completely customized experience. Combined with access to the source code and the tools required to make changes, we believe that the gap between buying and building is significantly reduced. Indeed, we believe that the classic buy vs. build now includes a highly competitive third option: a combination of the two.
In Itiviti’s whitepaper “Buy and build: A Blueprint for a Modern, Agile Trading System”, we explore approaches for creating a trading platform that is flexible enough to satisfy the changing needs of traders, powerful enough to deliver the analytics that provide better informed trading decisions and fast enough to satisfy client needs for performance and regulator expectations of trade visibility close to real time.
Trading How can you capitalize on global ETF trends and technology to stay competitive in a changing market? This ETF booklet covers: – The sizing and characteristics of the ETF marketplace – The structure of the ETF marketplace – Pain points for ETF market participants – Tbricks by Itiviti for ETFs – Buy vs. Build in […] May 22, 2018
Trading The world of trading is in constant evolution and over time the traditional distinctions between equities trading and FX trading have become blurred. This has in turn meant that requirements around a trading platform’s capabilities have aligned across the two asset classes, and what is now of key importance is to be able to combine […] May 15, 2018
Execution In March 2018, Itiviti and ULLINK completed a merger to build a global technology force in the capital markets industry. With extensive and complementary expertise, each company brings a unique heritage and product offering to the table that, when combined, create a new world leader in multi-asset trading and financial infrastructure solutions. May 3, 2018
FIX Infrastructure Meet VeriFIX Enterprise by Itiviti: the sophisticated approach to validating the complete trading infrastructure, designed to meet today’s complex testing needs. Interested in testing trends? Download our latest white paper here. May 2, 2018
By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.