The benefits of a modular approach to trading technology

By Martin Nilsson
April 11, 2017
Share:

The ability to respond rapidly to a new opportunity is a prerequisite for success in derivatives trading. Adding access to a new exchange or electronic execution venue, support for a new security, or compliance to the latest regulatory wrinkle is essential to making sure opportunities are realized and profits are made.

As a result, agility and flexibility are widely recognised as an essential characteristic of a modern trading platform that can match the challenging requirements of today’s global derivatives markets. Given the complexity of the derivatives business, though, building a competitive trading platform often entails a major capital project of a scale that necessarily undermines any pretext of agility.

Firms are understandably reticent about pursuing a major trading software implementation just to be able to trade a derivative in a new marketplace, or merely to explore possibilities on a new trading venue. What’s needed is a more flexible approach, one that allows firms to select, use and pay for only the trading tools and functionality they need in order to launch new activities rapidly and without major cost.

To ensure this kind of flexibility, trading technologies need to select platform providers that offer facilities for customizing the software they provide to clients. By taking a modular approach, firms can thus select only the functionality they need, without having to embark on a major IT project. In this way, firms can quickly enter new regional markets or trade new asset class types that until now have been out of reach for them.

Savvy suppliers are responding to this user need by opening up their architectures to allow users access to certain segments of their source code so they can can customize a solution to meet their specific needs. According to a TABB Group survey of 72 buy-side, sell-side and proprietary trading firms that are active in the global derivatives market, almost 40% of respondents said they had been able to buy what they needed in a modular way from their platform providers, although nearly one-third said they were unable to do so.

This approach, though, needs careful attention. It requires, for example, rigorous testing on the part of both supplier and consumer, to ensure functionality is what was intended and that the platform’s custom elements are robust and reliable. The approach can also be more expensive, with 30% of TABB survey respondents saying buying a la carte costs “much more”.

The message is that a modular approach can offer the kind of agility firms need to take advantage of emerging opportunities, but it’s vital to partner with the right supplier to ensure the result is fit for purpose and doesn’t cost the earth.

 

Related Content

The need to take an enterprise approach to testing

The need to take an enterprise approach to testing

FIX Infrastructure It goes without saying that it’s imperative for trading technologists to thoroughly test their systems before the put them in a production environment. Clearly, building a market-beating trading platform requires a high level of uptime and a propensity for failure that’s as close to zero as possible. And for years technologists have used a range […] November 5, 2018

The operational benefits of infrastructure testing

The operational benefits of infrastructure testing

FIX Infrastructure Getting it right. In earlier blog posts, we’ve discussed the challenges of implementing efficient trading infrastructure testing systems, and the intricate complexities of their adoption. But once all this hard work is completed, what are the potential rewards to be reaped? The operational benefits from instituting an enterprise-wide approach to trading system testing go far […] October 23, 2018

Exploring the business side of Systematic Internalisation

Exploring the business side of Systematic Internalisation

Risk & Compliance Nine months into the MiFID II era, it’s time to look beyond the compliance issues and start considering the business opportunities presented to firms operating under the Systematic Internaliser regime. With the support from a value-adding regulatory solution, SI status can be used for competitive advantage, suggests Jonas Lindqvist, Principal, Trading and Trade Execution, Itiviti. […] October 9, 2018

Trading infrastructure testing: the main challenges

Trading infrastructure testing: the main challenges

FIX Infrastructure In previous blog posts, we have discussed the importance of trading infrastructure testing and the regulatory and operational impetus driving its necessity. But when push comes to shove, how easy is it to implement these complex systems? What types of testing solutions are available, and what are the biggest challenges to their adoption? Today’s trading […] October 2, 2018

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Subscribe

Subscription successful

Thank you for subscribing!

Close window

Itiviti Talks

Get our view on global capital markets

Weekly email

    Trends in global capital markets from a technology perspective.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that data collected by us will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Notice.