With just weeks to go before the January 3 implementation deadline for the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), affected financial institutions are flat out as they attempt to achieve compliance as best they can.

This is a challenge.

MiFID II – considered by some to be the biggest regulatory shake-up of the European trading landscape in a generation – is broad in scope, touching on all aspects of financial services activity as it strives to improve investor protections, promote market transparency and avoid a repetition of the Credit Crisis of a decade ago. The regulation is now widely understood, although the European Securities Market Association (ESMA) even at this late stage continues to tinker with its guidance on minutiae. To date, firms’ preparations have involved creative innovations, as they grapple with the multi-faceted regulation.

Anecdotally, firms report that they expect to be ready in time for the deadline, albeit with significant workarounds that they are likely to revisit later to improve and streamline operations. Firms are finding, however, that the regulators’ intentions – in terms of more prescriptive measures around best execution, trading venues, trade / transaction reporting and other aspects of the trading work flow – are having consequences for market structure, potentially changing the way firms approach their trading business. And while Brexit is adding to general uncertainty about EU regulations, UK practitioners understand the need to achieve MiFID II compliance since the deadline falls well before any exit of the EU can take effect.

A number of key aspects require firms’ attention. These include:

  • Transparency, in terms of pre- and post-trade reporting;
  • Best execution and its implications for order and execution management systems, smart order routers (SORs) and record-keeping;
  • Algorithmic trading and monitoring;
  • Instrument and client definition management;
  • Time synchronization and high frequency trading classification;
  • Systematic internalization;
  • Risk compliance and checks.

These and other requirements introduced by MiFID II are impacting how firms operate after the January 3 deadline. Specific provisions – like the new volume caps and high-frequency trading (HFT) classification – as well as broader concepts like new venue types across all asset classes – will affect how firms approach macro issues like staffing and more micro issues like the operational requirements of the OMS and EMS platforms. For now, firms should focus their attention on the January 3, 2018, implementation date.

A few pointers:

  • There is no more time for strategic discussion – immediate action is the only option.
  • Consolidate where possible – it will be difficult to maintain a complex mix of vendor solutions and in-house developed applications.
  • Review the business model – identify strengths and weaknesses and look for potential outsourcing or use of external brokers for certain markets and/or asset classes.
  • Ensure reference data quality – it will affect trading business significantly under the new regime. Oh, and don’t expect to take too much time off for the holiday season. 

Download the white paper

MiFID II: Time for Action.

Related content

Alpha Omega acquisition thumbnail

Broadridge Acquires Innovative Post-Trade Solutions Business

NEW YORK, August 2, 2021 – Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (NYSE:BR), a global Fintech leader, today announced that...

Read more

The 19th Asia Pacific Trading Summit, 2 September, JW Marriott Hotel Hong Kong

Join Itiviti at the 19th Asia Pacific Trading Summit. This one-day, electronic trading event is known to bring...

Read more
Thumbnail image maker 4

History of the Short Sale Rules

As recent as 2021, there was a large controversy over short selling in Gamestop, where a group of...

Read more
imandra podcast Thumbnail website 2021

Podcast: Automated reasoning, a new paradigm in certification and onboarding

The financial services industry has historically struggled with software reliability and meeting related regulatory compliance requirements. With the...

Read more
Thumbnail image maker 9

WatersTechnology Asia Awards: Best Front Office Platform

Itiviti is proud to have received numerous industry awards in the front office category this year, including the...

Read more
Thumbnail website 2021 True market

Case study: Gedik Investment implements futures market making and algorithmic trading technology to enhance competitiveness

Gedik Investment is a leading investment banking, advisory and brokerage firm, providing brokerage and research services to domestic...

Read more
webinar waters 2021 thumbnail v2

Webinar recording: Modular applications and integrated platforms

Traditionally, sell-side front offices have been forced to make difficult choices between single, integrated trading platforms and discrete,...

Read more
Thumbnail image maker 9

Itiviti’s trading system named Best Front Office Platform at WatersTechnology Asia Awards 2021

Hong Kong, June 21, 2021 – Itiviti, a Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (NYSE:BR) business, today announced the recognition...

Read more

EMEA Trading Conference 2021

Itiviti is a proud sponsor to be part of the FIX EMEA Trading Conference 2021, Europe's largest one-day...

Read more

Written by

Johannes Frey-Skött, Vice President Engineering Agency Trading Apps, Itiviti

Share this insight