MiFID II: time to get to work

By Christer Wennerberg, Senior VP Market Structure Services
November 25, 2015

The recent and ongoing speculation around the possible delay in MiFID II’s implementation date – currently scheduled for January 2017 – should not distract market practitioners from the task in hand: to assess their obligations under the regulation and take appropriate steps towards meeting a tight deadline. Even a delay of one year does not create much breathing space.

So what should firms be doing now?

First, now that ESMA has published its final guidance, the scale of the requirement is clear. Firms need quickly to understand how they are affected – and whether certain business activities are worth the pain of compliance.

Key requirements – or areas of focus – identified by Itiviti clients include the following:

– Systematic Internalisers (SI)
– Enhanced transparency
– Best Execution
– Clock synchronization
– Pre-trade risk
– Instrument definition management
– Trading algorithm testing
– Management of all MiFID parameters (LIS, SMS, SSTI etc.) 

Each of these aspects will require significant action. Last month, we published a paper – ‘MiFID II: Practical Considerations of Gainful Compliance’. In it, we offered suggestions on how best to approach each (you can download the paper here ).

As part of our research for this paper, we surveyed select market participants on how they planned to approach the incoming regulation. From their responses, it is clear that a flexible approach to market structure changes is required to minimize risk in responding to the new European trading landscape and the expected and unforeseen innovation that will accompany the adoption of MiFID II.

Certainly, the marketplace has already begun to respond, with venues and ISVs announcing solutions to specific elements of the regulation. Any approach to compliance needs to support the ability to respond to these market-led developments, so that financial institutions are able to take advantage of emerging solutions.

Our survey also underscored the perceived role of incumbent ISVs in firms’ planned response to their MiFID II obligations. Particularly given the tight deadline the marketplace is facing, survey respondents expected to include innovations from their ISVs – instead of building, or as a complement to, their own solutions – for help in meeting the emerging requirements.

As part of the paper, Itiviti has developed a checklist for those looking to their ISVs as they assess their MiFID II obligations: 

– To what extent has your organization engaged with the regulators to understand client obligations under MiFID II?
– How far can we deploy MiFID I capabilities to meet MiFID II requirements?
– How will clock synchronization be handled?
– Storage of order and trade data is one thing, but how do we extract and analyses the data to provide meaningful information to the regulator?
– How is market abuse monitoring structured?
– Is the data model adapted for the new MMT (Market Model Typology) standard?
– Is there capacity enough to handle the anticipated growth in market data volumes?
– How easy is it to deploy a Systematic Internaliser engine, with low cost and short lead-times?

Whether or not MiFID II’s implementation date is postponed, now is the time to get to work on your firm’s response to this wide-ranging regulation. There are no short cuts. But ISVs can play a vital role by providing resource, expertise and technological knowhow. It’s worth asking your ISVs these questions before you commit to working with them on this project

Related Content

Identifying and responding to the demands of traders

Identifying and responding to the demands of traders

Blog The fast pace of derivatives markets makes their participants a demanding group. Derivatives traders must be flexible to succeed, and also need functional capabilities in their technology such as speed, global access and powerful analytics. They confront these needs in an environment affected by new regulation, plus more demands for market access and lower costs. […] April 27, 2017

The easy business case for automated testing

The easy business case for automated testing

Blog In the ongoing pursuit of efficiency and cost awareness among market participants, trading technology is often at the center of attention. Still there is at least one key function in trading systems left largely untouched by productivity and streamlining measures, and that is testing. Manual testing of trading infrastructure solutions remains prevalent within today’s financial […] April 20, 2017

The benefits of a modular approach to trading technology

The benefits of a modular approach to trading technology

Blog The ability to respond rapidly to a new opportunity is a prerequisite for success in derivatives trading. Adding access to a new exchange or electronic execution venue, support for a new security, or compliance to the latest regulatory wrinkle is essential to making sure opportunities are realized and profits are made. As a result, agility […] April 11, 2017

Automating testing with a trusted tool

Automating testing with a trusted tool

Automation & Testing Whether you are deploying FIX or proprietary protocol components within trading systems, thorough testing is crucial to success. Not only do you need to test your systems for execution venue driven events but also for managing the client flow. Manual testing is a costly and error-prone process that can be significantly improved and accelerated through automated testing. Automated regression […] April 6, 2017