In a low interest rate environment with regulatory hurdles, capital requirements, and technological complexities, how do firms in the futures industry thrive?
We gathered one seasoned fin tech reporter, Jim Kharouf from John Lothian News, and representatives from an FCM, an ISV, a prop firm/market maker, and a bank – to join us at a busy Chicago steakhouse, for a candid discussion about the state of the futures industry.
The contributors unanimously agreed that the current business environment remains challenging. Amongst the obstacles mentioned by FCM representatives were increased capital requirements, the additional liability carried on behalf of their customers (recently exemplified by Advantage Futures settlement with the CFTC on rules 1.73 and 1.11), account for clearing costs in their business models, and cope with risk models that are not perceived Furthermore, banks’ withdrawal from markets has resulted in fleeting liquidity.
Interestingly, in spite of headwinds, all participants are finding ways to grow their business. As the FCM segment contracts, larger firms have the opportunity to consolidate business. There was a consensus in the group that it was increasingly important to leverage core competencies and focus resources in niche areas. Likewise, trading firms with adequate capital and technology capacity have an opportunity to fill some of the void left by banks–a number are also exploring diversification strategies.
Industry participants are increasingly leveraging third-party technology to offset cost and complexity. The challenge remains finding vendors with the longevity and market knowledge to be partners, and solutions that allow participants to focus on core business drivers. One participant commented that sometimes vended solutions look good on paper, and may perform to specifications, but that his main concern was around all aspects, including operational, which may not be up to scratch to make a purchase worthwhile.
Speaking of the coming years, the group opined that cost and regulatory hurdles are so high in the current environment that few new entrants are expected. For incumbents that are able to focus on their core competencies, and remain differentiated from their competition, new opportunities will be found now and going forward.
To read the full report from John Lothian News, please click here
Risk & Compliance The deadline for MIFID II compliance is less than six months away. Though the regulation is largely understood, firms anecdotally report that they expect to be ready with significant workarounds that will likely need to be revisited in the future to improve and streamline operations. More interestingly, firms are finding that the regulators’ intentions are […] August 15, 2017
Risk & Compliance Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) and the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) require huge volumes of data to be sourced and managed. This webinar, organized by Intelligent Trading Technology in July 2017, discusses what sort of data analytics you need to implement to be able to process and analyse MiFID […] August 2, 2017
Risk & Compliance In this video series, Jim Northey, Senior Vice President Strategy and Research at Itiviti, tackles the implications of MiFID II for firms in terms of order routing, time synchronization and Best Execution. In the second segment, he also explores the impact that MiFID II and the Consolidated Audit Trail are likely to have in the […] July 25, 2017
Risk & Compliance Jim Northey explores the implications of MiFID II and the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) for US firms, and provides general advice on how to work towards MiFID II compliance in the run-up to the January 3rd, 2018 deadline. July 18, 2017