To buy or not to buy — that is the question in financial technology. Or at least it has been for a very long time. The arguments for building in-house have remained constant and include the need for performance and the quest for differentiation (such as customized trading strategies). At the same time, time-to-market, complexity and – most obviously – cost, were key arguments for buying. But what if there was a third approach: buy and build?
All of the arguments for build and buy respectively still have merit, but we believe that their respective weights have shifted over time, effectively making in-house development an even more exclusive option. The most significant driver behind this shift is the advance of technology and a more flexible approach to trading system design.
High-speed trading connectivity has been a major advantage for the past several years. But as low-latency infrastructures become a mainstream capability, the cost of generating incremental speed has become prohibitive, and market participants are seeking new ways to differentiate their activities.
Firms are seeking to add value to their trading systems, while maintaining the high-speed connectivity they need to remain competitive. To accommodate new capabilities – in the form of pre-trade analytics, risk controls and post-trade clearing intelligence – trading firms across the board are re-evaluating their systems.
A higher level of trading system flexibility based on modern system architecture and the use more open technologies, means that smaller players can start to add unique functionality where before they were constrained by resource to use of vanilla third-party systems with little scope for differentiation.
A modern trading system such as Tbricks by Itiviti allows clients to choose freely from a library of business logic (we call this apps) for a completely customized experience. Combined with access to the source code and the tools required to make changes, we believe that the gap between buying and building is significantly reduced. Indeed, we believe that the classic buy vs. build now includes a highly competitive third option: a combination of the two.
In Itiviti’s whitepaper “Buy and build: A Blueprint for a Modern, Agile Trading System”, we explore approaches for creating a trading platform that is flexible enough to satisfy the changing needs of traders, powerful enough to deliver the analytics that provide better informed trading decisions and fast enough to satisfy client needs for performance and regulator expectations of trade visibility close to real time.
Trading Kirk Kvist, Itiviti’s Director of Professional Services for the Americas region, makes the case for and against professional services, outlining instances in which outsourcing can be beneficial vis-à-vis situations in which it is preferable to use internal resources. Essentially it comes down to the three key aspects of any project: scope, time and cost. Is […] September 22, 2017
Trading Staff Augmentation vs. Professional Services for Trading Firms In a world where trading firms always need to be one step ahead of the game in the technology race, it is becoming increasingly challenging to balance the demands of innovation with core trading business activities. A common solution is to look towards getting more hands on […] September 5, 2017
Trading Chris Anderson, Senior Product Manager at Itiviti, delves into the history of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and the key drivers that have shaped their evolution over time. The video highlights the key points covered in the TED-style talk delivered at FOW Trading Chicago in June 2017. Read more about ETF Trading August 29, 2017
Trading In recent years, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have seen phenomenal activity and growth. Regulation, product innovation and investor appetite have driven global Assets under management (AUM) to record levels, while also fueling increasing market structure complexity and straining trading platform capabilities across the board. Itiviti, in conjunction with GreySpark Partners, recently engaged in a comprehensive review […] May 18, 2017