To buy or not to buy — that is the question in financial technology. Or at least it has been for a very long time. The arguments for building in-house have remained constant and include the need for performance and the quest for differentiation (such as customized trading strategies). At the same time, time-to-market, complexity and – most obviously – cost, were key arguments for buying. But what if there was a third approach: buy and build?
All of the arguments for build and buy respectively still have merit, but we believe that their respective weights have shifted over time, effectively making in-house development an even more exclusive option. The most significant driver behind this shift is the advance of technology and a more flexible approach to trading system design.
High-speed trading connectivity has been a major advantage for the past several years. But as low-latency infrastructures become a mainstream capability, the cost of generating incremental speed has become prohibitive, and market participants are seeking new ways to differentiate their activities.
Firms are seeking to add value to their trading systems, while maintaining the high-speed connectivity they need to remain competitive. To accommodate new capabilities – in the form of pre-trade analytics, risk controls and post-trade clearing intelligence – trading firms across the board are re-evaluating their systems.
A higher level of trading system flexibility based on modern system architecture and the use more open technologies, means that smaller players can start to add unique functionality where before they were constrained by resource to use of vanilla third-party systems with little scope for differentiation.
A modern trading system such as Tbricks by Itiviti allows clients to choose freely from a library of business logic (we call this apps) for a completely customized experience. Combined with access to the source code and the tools required to make changes, we believe that the gap between buying and building is significantly reduced. Indeed, we believe that the classic buy vs. build now includes a highly competitive third option: a combination of the two.
In Itiviti’s whitepaper “Buy and build: A Blueprint for a Modern, Agile Trading System”, we explore approaches for creating a trading platform that is flexible enough to satisfy the changing needs of traders, powerful enough to deliver the analytics that provide better informed trading decisions and fast enough to satisfy client needs for performance and regulator expectations of trade visibility close to real time.
Blog With MiFID II regulation now less than 12 months away, the race to ensure compliance heats up. In a recent letter penned by Steven Maijoor ESMA Chair, Mr Maijoor expressed concerns on the “potential establishment of networks of Systematic Internalisers (SIs) to circumvent certain MiFID II obligations.” The implementation of MiFID I saw the introduction […] June 13, 2017
Blog It was a pleasure to have an opportunity to speak at the 2017 Americas Trading Briefing, which was graciously hosted by Goldman Sachs. As usual, the room was filled with more than 250 senior market participants and 25 expert speakers to discuss important topics, trends and issues we face together as the FIX Trading Community. […] June 7, 2017
Articles & Reports In recent years, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have seen phenomenal activity and growth. Regulation, product innovation and investor appetite have driven global Assets under management (AUM) to record levels, while also fueling increasing market structure complexity and straining trading platform capabilities across the board. Itiviti, in conjunction with GreySpark Partners, recently engaged in a comprehensive review […] May 18, 2017
Automation & Testing For many sell-side firms, client onboarding and certification is a drag on productivity. The traditional methods used to perform these processes are manual, and therefore time-consuming. Because the process is so labor intensive, some firms maintain substantial backlogs of clients waiting for connections to trade. Slow onboarding is costing the business, as it leads to […] May 2, 2017